Thinking about ChatGPT as a pedagogy problem, rather than a plagiarism problem, is a way to approach our teaching generatively.
Scaffolding mitigates library anxiety, imposter syndrome, and accidental plagiarism.
Rather than assigning a big, summative paper or project at the end of the course, breaking it up into stages with student reflection reinforces original work and a growth mindset that can reduce the perceived need for students using a tool such as ChatGPT.
Our liaison librarians can help: Set up an instruction consultation.
Start with the UA Generative AI Syllabus Guidelines, August 2023 - PDF
For a list of more AI tools, see AI Tools Landscape by Carlos Lizarraga-Celaya.
meta(LAB) at Harvard - The AI Pedagogy Project
A collection of assignments and materials for educators curious about how AI affects their students and their syllabi.
Integrating Generative AI in Teaching and Learning: Faculty approaches across Barnard
Faculty across disciplines provide a glimpse into their approaches.
Critical Thinking with AI: Two Approaches
"How can we use AI to foster rather than replace critical thinking? The answer may lie in providing worked examples demonstrating the steps taken in the critical thinking process, using AI not as an answer tool but as a process tool."
Ethan Mollick, Wharton School at Univ. of Pennsylvania.
Student use cases for AI, Mollick & Mollick, Sept. 2023.
Start with these articles from his newsletter:
Sign up for his newsletter: One Useful Thing. And read his paper: Mollick, Ethan R. and Mollick, Lilach, Using AI to Implement Effective Teaching Strategies in Classrooms: Five Strategies, Including Prompts (March 17, 2023).
Main Library | 1510 E. University Blvd.
Tucson, AZ 85721
(520) 621-6442
University Information Security and Privacy
© 2023 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of The University of Arizona.