Skip to main content
The University of Arizona

Mobile Apps & Resources in the Health Sciences: Evaluating Apps

FREE health sciences-related mobile apps available & apps available on the iPads you can borrow from Arizona Health Sciences Library (AHSL). Overview of apps that allow full-text access to AHSL resources, as well as info on evaluating apps.

Keep in Mind

signpostRemember: while many mobile apps are incredibly helpful, they should be used in context with your knowledge of evidence-based practice.  Some of the apps in this guide will connect you with official sources of health sciences-related literature made available through the Arizona Health Sciences Library.  If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask one of our librarians, the liaison librarian for your Arizona health sciences college, or a knowledgeable faculty member.

Be careful about choosing apps, you may die of a misprint! (Based on the quote by Mark Twain, "Be careful about reading health books.  You may die of a misprint.")

Evaluating Apps

Medical apps are currently unregulated.  The FDA says it is preparing to regulate a subset of medical apps (those that perform more like medical devices), but most medical apps are not regulated.  There are good medical apps, along with those that are not so good.  Use your evidence-based decision making skills to tell the difference.

As you decide whether to use an app, you can use the following criteria (ABACUS), along with testing according to this framework, to help you evaluate it:


  • Is the medical information contained in the app based on sound medical research and evidence? Can the information in the app be verified by another source?
  • Are there references/sources included so that you can verify the information? Are these references reliable? (For example, a citation to a drug company website does not have the same weight as an article from JAMA.)
  • Are there grammatical and spelling errors? (This may be a "tell" - if the information isn't even spelled correctly, maybe the information itself isn't correct.)
  • Does the app do what it intends to do? Is there any potential for patient harm?


  • Is the information showing just one point of view or is it sponsored by a company that is trying to sell something?
  • What kind of organization sponsored the app? A pharmaceutical company? A non-profit organization? A reputable journal?
  • Is advertising clearly marked and distinguishable from the informational/medical content? Can you tell if the information you are reading is advertisement?
  • Does the app use data improperly to promote a position or a product, or is it unbiased/neutral?


  • Who developed the app? What are the person's or sponsoring organization's credentials? Are they an expert in the content presented in the app?  What do you know about them? 
  • Is the person backed by a known organization? (Be careful here... some "organizations" may simply be unreliable groups operating out of someone's basement; try to go with auhoritative sources, like the National Library of Medicine.)
  • Do experts review the content provided in the app and are these "experts" real authorities on the content?
  • Can you easily find contact information in the app or on its download/information page? Check the about us link/seller information, usually found on the app's download page. What is the purpose of the organization? Is it trying to sell something or is it an unbiased, peer-reviewed information source?


  • When was the app created and/or last updated? 
  • Does the app provide regular updates when new content or technological upgrades are required? 
  • Has there been more recent research on the content in the app? Many medical treatments change with the publication of new studies. What was published a year ago may be outdated now.


  • Does the app work reliably and stably on the device you are using?
  • Is navigation smooth and intuitive?
  • Is the app efficient and effective? For example, is the type of content usable on a small screen (e.g., radiological images)? Is data entry easy?
  • Is the app appropriate for the target audience (e.g., patient info apps are in plain language)?
  • Does the app author provide technical support for the app?
  • Is the app stand-alone (meaning you can use it without a wi-fi or Internet connection)?  This is just a good thing to note so you are aware about whether the app can be used without an Internet connection.


  • Is the medical information presented in the app complete?
  • Are there sources given for additional information?
  • Who is the target audience - is the app targeted for use by medical professionals, patients, others?

question markBe sure to ask yourself:

  • Why did the person/organization create the app? 
  • What's in it for them or are they trying to sell me something?
  • Is the creator of the app an expert in the content presented in the app?
  • Can I verify the information being presented to me in the app and is it accurate?
  • Is there a way I can contact the app developer to provide feedback or ask a question?
  • Are there any login requirements or privacy issues that I need to know about if I choose to use this app?  Will my use of this app be tracked in any way?
  • Is there a disclaimer that states any impact on clinical decision making, patient safety?

TEST before you use:

  • TEST the app before you use it in clinical carecrash test dummy - create clinical scenarios and test.
  • As you test, observe and evaluate the app according to the above ABACUS framework. Does it pass the Accurate, un-Biased, Authoritative, Current, Usable, Scope/Completeness benchmarks in multiple case scenarios?


Bonus! Evaluating Infographics


This guide was originally conceived and created by Nicole Capdarest-Arest now at Lane Library, Stanford University.